Another surprise but that seams logical because all of the best known summits of Julians are already covered. Great addition Bor! I wonder how visited Z.Ozebnik is. Numbers must be quite low.
Thanks Sasha! Yes there is not many mountains left in Julian Alps. Only the whole ridge of Loska stena (there is many mountains, I think there we must do around 6 or 7 SP pages of mountains), then the mountains on the ridge between Bavski grintavec and Jalovec (Pelci and so on) and many other mountains! I think a lot of work still! :-)
Now this is a tough one for me. First, Bor, thanks for adding another fine page! But my problem is the following one:
I know Z. Ozebnik belongs to the Triglav group. It is stated so also in our guidebooks. But its small massif belongs somehow more to Veliko Spicje ridge. Like the ridge of Cisti vrh and Ticarica, north of Veliko Spicje. They are all Trenta mountains, for which we don't have a special group. And here comes my problem: I put those mountains into the Bohinj group - for Veliko Spicje that's correct, for the mentioned Trenta mountains no more so.
You linked this page to the Triglav group, where I can not make the link back (on the map). I can mention Ozebnik in the text, but would rather not change maps. So my proposal is, that on the maps, I link to this page on the Bohinj subgroup page and in the text on the Triglav subgroup page. Is that okay?
Yes no problem. You put this page on the map of Bohinj group and you can mention and do the links also on Triglav group page. But now I don`t know which group to write in Geographical structure! :-)
Bor - Feb 13, 2005 1:57 pm - Hasn't voted
Untitled CommentThanks for the vote Cici!
Velebit - Feb 13, 2005 2:16 pm - Voted 10/10
Untitled CommentAnother surprise but that seams logical because all of the best known summits of Julians are already covered. Great addition Bor! I wonder how visited Z.Ozebnik is. Numbers must be quite low.
Bor - Feb 13, 2005 3:26 pm - Hasn't voted
Untitled CommentThanks Sasha! Yes there is not many mountains left in Julian Alps. Only the whole ridge of Loska stena (there is many mountains, I think there we must do around 6 or 7 SP pages of mountains), then the mountains on the ridge between Bavski grintavec and Jalovec (Pelci and so on) and many other mountains! I think a lot of work still! :-)
Klenke - Feb 13, 2005 2:16 pm - Voted 10/10
Untitled CommentMore pretty terrain east of the Adriatic.
Bor - Feb 13, 2005 3:27 pm - Hasn't voted
Untitled CommentThanks fot the vote! :-)
Vid Pogachnik - Feb 13, 2005 2:45 pm - Voted 10/10
Untitled CommentNow this is a tough one for me. First, Bor, thanks for adding another fine page! But my problem is the following one:
I know Z. Ozebnik belongs to the Triglav group. It is stated so also in our guidebooks. But its small massif belongs somehow more to Veliko Spicje ridge. Like the ridge of Cisti vrh and Ticarica, north of Veliko Spicje. They are all Trenta mountains, for which we don't have a special group. And here comes my problem: I put those mountains into the Bohinj group - for Veliko Spicje that's correct, for the mentioned Trenta mountains no more so.
You linked this page to the Triglav group, where I can not make the link back (on the map). I can mention Ozebnik in the text, but would rather not change maps. So my proposal is, that on the maps, I link to this page on the Bohinj subgroup page and in the text on the Triglav subgroup page. Is that okay?
Bor - Feb 13, 2005 3:30 pm - Hasn't voted
Untitled CommentYes no problem. You put this page on the map of Bohinj group and you can mention and do the links also on Triglav group page. But now I don`t know which group to write in Geographical structure! :-)
Vid Pogachnik - Feb 13, 2005 3:37 pm - Voted 10/10
Untitled CommentLeave it, as it is. I did all the links, so it's ok.
Bor - Feb 13, 2005 3:27 pm - Hasn't voted
Untitled CommentThanks for the vote!
Bor - Feb 13, 2005 3:27 pm - Hasn't voted
Untitled CommentThanks for the vote!
Lee Stamm - Feb 13, 2005 3:39 pm - Voted 10/10
Untitled CommentBeautiful. Thanks for adding this great page.
Bor - Feb 13, 2005 3:40 pm - Hasn't voted
Untitled CommentThanks for nice words and vote!
Cheers!
Scott - Feb 13, 2005 5:21 pm - Voted 10/10
Untitled CommentNice one Bor!
wildstar - Feb 13, 2005 9:05 pm - Voted 10/10
Untitled CommentFantastic.
Bor - Feb 14, 2005 12:53 am - Hasn't voted
Untitled CommentThanks!
miztflip - Feb 13, 2005 9:24 pm - Voted 10/10
Untitled CommentAnother great page Bor, keep'em coming.
Gangolf Haub - Feb 14, 2005 2:42 am - Voted 10/10
Untitled CommentAnother good one, Bor. You seem to have too much time these days...
mtwashingtonmonroe - Feb 14, 2005 9:31 am - Voted 10/10
Untitled CommentGreat page Bor! Another beautiful summit! Have a good one!
-Britt
Bor - Feb 14, 2005 10:31 am - Hasn't voted
Untitled CommentThanks for nice comments and vote! Cheers!
Corax - Feb 14, 2005 5:08 pm - Voted 10/10
Untitled CommentYet another four star page about a very nice looking area. Gotta go there in the right season next time.