Thinking thoroughly about this List page, I decided to create *two* Master Lists. One Master List shows peaks that are defined as having a minimum 300' of prominence, which is the standard Tim Worth originally used. Another Master List only shows peaks that are defined as having a minimum 400' of prominence. A 400P type of peak list tends to be most agreeable amongst peakbaggers, especially those in/around Washington. I will leave it to the individuals to decide which Master List to use; there are only six different peaks on each list.
I will keep Tim Worth's original 100m, 800m, and 1600m steepness lists on the page, as a general reference. He put quite a lot of effort into those lists, and that effort should not be forgotten.
Redwic - Jan 31, 2011 11:39 pm - Hasn't voted
Two Master Lists CreatedThinking thoroughly about this List page, I decided to create *two* Master Lists. One Master List shows peaks that are defined as having a minimum 300' of prominence, which is the standard Tim Worth originally used. Another Master List only shows peaks that are defined as having a minimum 400' of prominence. A 400P type of peak list tends to be most agreeable amongst peakbaggers, especially those in/around Washington. I will leave it to the individuals to decide which Master List to use; there are only six different peaks on each list.
I will keep Tim Worth's original 100m, 800m, and 1600m steepness lists on the page, as a general reference. He put quite a lot of effort into those lists, and that effort should not be forgotten.
Redwic - Jan 31, 2011 11:41 pm - Hasn't voted
GPS CoordinatesSometime soon, I plan to include either an online map link, GPS coordinates, or both for each peak shown on the Master List(s).