I'm using the same 200 feet of prominence rule as the Wasatch Mountain club. North Timp and (do you mean North Nebo?) just slipped my mind. I'll get some figures in there as soon as I can.
Ryan, By quads do you means just list the quad it is in or actually put up the quads?
Thanks. I only have a list for the peaks in SL county and was just adding the others as I ran across them. I knew that the north peak of nebo was the highpoint, but I meant North Peak, which does belong on the list anyway.
If we're going off of 200 feet of prominence, where does un-named 11,040+ (maybe called 11,060) just west of Monte Cristo along Cottonwood Ridge rate? The saddle between it and Monte Cristo shows as 10,840+ (10,860)? Any thoughts?
I just assumed I wouldn't have to worry about any peaks inside salt lake county, as I have a list of peaks with 200 feet of prominance in my Hiking the Wasatch book. There are still some down south I haven't put in, and I'll look into this one as well.
Does the unranked one under #15, "Unnamed 0.4 west of Pfeifferhorn" refer to Chipman Peak, or something else? It's not traditionally considered prominent enough to count, so the ~200 listed would likely be at least a slight overestimate.
Ah, thanks. I had a view of the area yesterday and realized there are two minor peaks between Pfeifferhorn and S. Thunder, not one like I'd thought; the more prominent unnamed one must be the one I thought was Chipman.
I would love to see the 'List of Completers' get filled in. I'm curious who on here as done them all. I'll be putting myself on the list sometime next year I hope.
RyanS - Feb 13, 2006 7:42 pm - Voted 7/10
quads, too!Quadrangles would be an excellent addition as well.
Ammon Hatch - Feb 13, 2006 8:16 pm - Hasn't voted
ProminenceI'm using the same 200 feet of prominence rule as the Wasatch Mountain club. North Timp and (do you mean North Nebo?) just slipped my mind. I'll get some figures in there as soon as I can.
Ryan, By quads do you means just list the quad it is in or actually put up the quads?
Ammon Hatch - Feb 14, 2006 1:27 am - Hasn't voted
Re: ProminenceThanks. I only have a list for the peaks in SL county and was just adding the others as I ran across them. I knew that the north peak of nebo was the highpoint, but I meant North Peak, which does belong on the list anyway.
MrWasatch - Mar 3, 2006 6:12 pm - Hasn't voted
Another 11er?If we're going off of 200 feet of prominence, where does un-named 11,040+ (maybe called 11,060) just west of Monte Cristo along Cottonwood Ridge rate? The saddle between it and Monte Cristo shows as 10,840+ (10,860)? Any thoughts?
Ammon Hatch - Mar 7, 2006 5:36 pm - Hasn't voted
Re: Another 11er?I just assumed I wouldn't have to worry about any peaks inside salt lake county, as I have a list of peaks with 200 feet of prominance in my Hiking the Wasatch book. There are still some down south I haven't put in, and I'll look into this one as well.
Scott - Sep 17, 2007 10:32 am - Hasn't voted
"South Timpanogos"Minor error: I assume "South Timpanogos" should be elevation 11,722 instead of 11,750?
PS, it's also known as the "Second Summit".
Ammon Hatch - Sep 19, 2007 2:26 pm - Hasn't voted
Re: "South Timpanogos"I'll trust you on that one. I don't remember where I got the 11750 figure, but the prominence figure for it is probably wrong too then..
Scott - Sep 19, 2007 3:42 pm - Hasn't voted
Re:Nope, the prominence is right. I think you repeated the main summit (#2 on the list) elevation twice (11,750 or on some maps 11,749).
Map
11,750 is for the main summit and the south one or "Second Summit" is 11,722. Anyway, looks fixed.
Nice list.
seanpeckham - May 30, 2008 2:47 pm - Hasn't voted
Chipman PeakDoes the unranked one under #15, "Unnamed 0.4 west of Pfeifferhorn" refer to Chipman Peak, or something else? It's not traditionally considered prominent enough to count, so the ~200 listed would likely be at least a slight overestimate.
Ammon Hatch - May 31, 2008 7:22 pm - Hasn't voted
Re: Chipman PeakNo, it refers to the peak centered in the topo here:
http://www.mytopo.com/maps.cfm?mtlat=40.5326&mtlon=-111.7132&z=15
Chipman peak is neither an 11er, or prominent in any significant fashion.
seanpeckham - Jun 1, 2008 1:31 pm - Hasn't voted
Re: Chipman PeakAh, thanks. I had a view of the area yesterday and realized there are two minor peaks between Pfeifferhorn and S. Thunder, not one like I'd thought; the more prominent unnamed one must be the one I thought was Chipman.
runbyu1 - Sep 24, 2011 1:22 pm - Hasn't voted
List of completers?I would love to see the 'List of Completers' get filled in. I'm curious who on here as done them all. I'll be putting myself on the list sometime next year I hope.
Ammon Hatch - Nov 11, 2011 9:34 pm - Hasn't voted
Re: List of completers?No completers have come forward asking to be added to the page, and I have not yet completed myself. Still 4 ranked ones to go...
edge - Oct 27, 2014 12:35 am - Hasn't voted
Pk 11036I'm curious as to why Pk 11007 was included and not Pk 11036. Any reason?