RyanS - Feb 2, 2004 11:52 am - Voted 10/10
UN 13,060??I think that might not be Clark Peak.
John Prater - Feb 3, 2004 5:53 pm - Hasn't voted
Re: UN 13,060??Oh, do you always have to be right, Ryan?! :-) The topography certainly matches UN 13060 better than Clark. Also, this is the same peak as shown in this photo, which shows the location of the lakes beneath Clark and UN 13060.
Also Kane, this would be the southwest face of UN 13060, not the north face.
RyanS - Feb 4, 2004 11:04 am - Voted 10/10
Re: UN 13,060??Thanks for linking to that other photo... I hadn't yet put 2 & 2 together, but what a gorgeous, rugged peak that unnamed is. And it looks like there's more than one weak spot that you could use to access its ridge from the PLB.... mmmm.....
Kane - Feb 4, 2004 8:00 pm - Hasn't voted
Re: UN 13,060??Thanks, your right!
Kane - Feb 4, 2004 8:03 pm - Hasn't voted
Re: UN 13,060??Kane - Feb 4, 2004 8:04 pm - Hasn't voted
Re: UN 13,060??Is this Clark Peak?
RyanS - Feb 6, 2004 11:31 am - Voted 10/10
Re: UN 13,060??It really looks like it, Kane, though I don't know if I ever looked back at that point. That's still very much upper Bear Creek, right? Maybe a hundred feet lower than your photo above?
Comments
Post a Comment