There is some good information and a pretty picture, but parts of the page are a bit thin. More pictures and more information in the "Overview" section would improve the page. What makes the peak interesting? Is it particularly pretty (it looks pretty)? High? Historically important? In other words, why should someone be interested in climbing it?
Dave K - Apr 1, 2003 2:05 pm - Hasn't voted
Untitled CommentThere is some good information and a pretty picture, but parts of the page are a bit thin. More pictures and more information in the "Overview" section would improve the page. What makes the peak interesting? Is it particularly pretty (it looks pretty)? High? Historically important? In other words, why should someone be interested in climbing it?
Please let me know if you make any changes.
Scott - May 10, 2004 9:49 pm - Hasn't voted
Untitled CommentLooks like a good page. More details would be nice.
Update: Not bad, but no signs of improvement.
Corax - Aug 23, 2005 1:00 pm - Hasn't voted
Untitled CommentQuite thin on info, but with nice photos.
No signature photo.
Is the maintainer active?
Knock-knock!
virtualtromsoNO - Apr 4, 2009 10:40 am - Hasn't voted
360 panorama view from the tophttp://www.virtualtromso.no/no/panoramabilder-fra-tromso/53-top-of-tromsdalstind-1280m-june-2008.html
panorama taken at 2:40 AM