Check the spelling in areas. For example, on the route page, you say "remote and dificult"
Also, check the photos. You have a small typo on the "Crux photo", with too many Capital letters. Overall, a good job for a lesser known peak in an incredible mountain range!
Hey Sean, this peak is showing up over in the Beaverheads. The Lat/Lon should be somewhere closer to 44.2812/-113.9070. Also, you may want to update the elevation (currently 11 feet).
brendon - Aug 14, 2006 7:01 pm - Voted 10/10
A spare tire...Odd that you'd mention that :)
hgrapid - Aug 15, 2006 1:45 am - Voted 10/10
Good page...butCheck the spelling in areas. For example, on the route page, you say "remote and dificult"
Also, check the photos. You have a small typo on the "Crux photo", with too many Capital letters. Overall, a good job for a lesser known peak in an incredible mountain range!
BeDrinkable - Aug 16, 2006 7:10 pm - Voted 8/10
elevation?I think your elevation is a little off. Otherwise, nice page.
desainme - Aug 18, 2006 6:16 am - Voted 10/10
I sent you a PMabout the map coordinates. A 3330 meter mountain has to have some high contours
Super Dave - Sep 18, 2006 4:32 pm - Hasn't voted
NumbersHey Sean, this peak is showing up over in the Beaverheads. The Lat/Lon should be somewhere closer to 44.2812/-113.9070. Also, you may want to update the elevation (currently 11 feet).
Hasta, Dave
Wandering Sole Images - May 27, 2007 3:02 pm - Hasn't voted
Elevationhmmm, looks like I'm the 3rd person to mention this, but you have the elevation at 11' or 3m