might consider posting this as a separate mountain instead of as part of GCNP. Very cool looking route.
rpc
Steven Cross - Nov 15, 2002 4:49 pm - Hasn't voted
Route Comment
I highly agree, I have considered adding it myself, but do not have any info in it, or have not done it, so have not added it. this could make a very good page by itself.
I think SP2 will handle this better. In SP2, we'll be able to have "climbing areas" so we would have something like:
Area > Formation > Route
For this particular case it would be:
Grand Canyon > Zoroaster Temple > Northeast Arête
The same way we would have say:
City of Rock > Elephant Rock > Rye Crisp
Castle Crags > Mount Hubris > Cosmic Wall
Zion > Temple of Sinawava > Moonlight Buttress
I don't have a problem with Zoroaster Temple being listed part of the GCNP (afterall, it is physically in the GCNP) or having it's own Mountain Page. To me, using the main GC page as is the case now follows the Third Pillar of Dana precedent. In either case, I think the GC should be recognized as a climbing / scrambling area - in addition to a hiking / mule-riding area.
rpc - Nov 11, 2002 3:53 pm - Hasn't voted
Route Commentmight consider posting this as a separate mountain instead of as part of GCNP. Very cool looking route.
rpc
Steven Cross - Nov 15, 2002 4:49 pm - Hasn't voted
Route CommentI highly agree, I have considered adding it myself, but do not have any info in it, or have not done it, so have not added it. this could make a very good page by itself.
John - Nov 15, 2002 7:36 pm - Hasn't voted
Route CommentI think SP2 will handle this better. In SP2, we'll be able to have "climbing areas" so we would have something like:
Area > Formation > Route
For this particular case it would be:
Grand Canyon > Zoroaster Temple > Northeast Arête
The same way we would have say:
City of Rock > Elephant Rock > Rye Crisp
Castle Crags > Mount Hubris > Cosmic Wall
Zion > Temple of Sinawava > Moonlight Buttress
I don't have a problem with Zoroaster Temple being listed part of the GCNP (afterall, it is physically in the GCNP) or having it's own Mountain Page. To me, using the main GC page as is the case now follows the Third Pillar of Dana precedent. In either case, I think the GC should be recognized as a climbing / scrambling area - in addition to a hiking / mule-riding area.