For some reason you got me interested. Here's the scale in a 10m resolution digital elevation model, it shows the high point at 6297.
I'm curious on what your opinion is for the height of the summit where the crosshairs are here. If you think it is 6280+ ft (i.e., the small contour arc at the north end of the crest should be counted), then select YES for "Is this post useful?" If you thin it is 6240+ ft (i.e, the small contour arc at the north end of the crest should be disregarded), then select NO for "Is this post useful?"
brendon - Dec 10, 2005 7:50 pm - Hasn't voted
Untitled CommentFor some reason you got me interested. Here's the scale in a 10m resolution digital elevation model, it shows the high point at 6297.
Klenke - Dec 1, 2005 1:55 am - Hasn't voted
Untitled CommentI'm curious on what your opinion is for the height of the summit where the crosshairs are here.
If you think it is 6280+ ft (i.e., the small contour arc at the north end of the crest should be counted), then select YES for "Is this post useful?"
If you thin it is 6240+ ft (i.e, the small contour arc at the north end of the crest should be disregarded), then select NO for "Is this post useful?"
brendon - Dec 10, 2005 7:50 pm - Hasn't voted
Untitled CommentFor some reason you got me interested. Here's the scale in a 10m resolution digital elevation model, it shows the high point at 6297.
