Nice page. It looks like pretty extreme stuff. I noticed part of the climb is rated 5.5 and I wonder if parts of the climb aren't rated a little more difficult than that ?
Yes ther eare some routes that are more difficult. One on them on the ( I believe North-east face_ has not been repeated. Apparently the route was so rotten the climbers do not reccomend a repeat. The route that I have briefly covered is detailed in Sean D. Book Selected Alpine Climbs of Canada. It covers the complete traverse. It dosent mention anything more difficult. It may be the angle of this shot. The ones in the book look less imposing. Cheers William
Jerry L - Feb 20, 2004 4:58 pm - Voted 10/10
Untitled CommentNice page. It looks like pretty extreme stuff. I noticed part of the climb is rated 5.5 and I wonder if parts of the climb aren't rated a little more difficult than that ?
William Marler - Feb 22, 2004 5:12 pm - Hasn't voted
Untitled CommentYes ther eare some routes that are more difficult. One on them on the ( I believe North-east face_ has not been repeated. Apparently the route was so rotten the climbers do not reccomend a repeat. The route that I have briefly covered is detailed in Sean D. Book Selected Alpine Climbs of Canada. It covers the complete traverse. It dosent mention anything more difficult. It may be the angle of this shot. The ones in the book look less imposing. Cheers William
Gangolf Haub - Feb 21, 2004 5:49 am - Voted 10/10
Untitled CommentGood page again, William. Nice pics though the weather wasn't quite up to it, was it?
Gangolf
William Marler - Feb 22, 2004 5:06 pm - Hasn't voted
Untitled CommentThanks and cheers. I hope to improve it with some summit picks this summer.
kletterwebbi - Feb 25, 2004 12:59 am - Voted 10/10
Untitled CommentGood page ... as usual.
William Marler - Feb 25, 2004 8:32 am - Hasn't voted
Untitled CommentThanks
Dow Williams - Aug 30, 2005 10:34 am - Voted 10/10
Untitled CommentHad excellent light this morning, so took a photo. Still trying to get the traverse in this year. Cheers.