The Wallowas of eastern Oregon are a spectacular place. Though not kknown so much for technical rock climbing, they offer some of the best backpacking and scrambling opportunities in the state (our humble opinion). I believe they have the densest cluster of 9000' peaks in the state.
RPC, I am curious as to whether it should be Aneroid Peak or Aneroid Mountain, not that it really matters either way. My maps all say Aneroid Mountain. A search on the web brings up Aneroid Mountain the majority of the time, but Aneroid Peak some of the time too. I have always referred to it as Aneroid Mountain. --Paul
thanks for the vote. I think it was the OR snowshoe book that referred to it as Aneroid "Peak". Not sure what the USGS maps say. I'll make a note of it on the page.
The mountain is indeed called Aneroid Mountain, not Aneroid Peak. See the Topozone link (USGS map). You really should change the name (and other textual references to it). The snowshoeing book is wrong.
Also, on the Main Page in the first paragraph you list the other 9,000-ft Wallowa peaks in parentheses. You should note that many new peaks have since been added to SP. You could include those new ones too...unless it looks like clutter.
bigwally - Dec 25, 2002 3:15 pm - Voted 10/10
Untitled CommentGreat page, with good photos. Thank you sooo much for putting your efforts into this one !!!!!!!
rpc - Dec 26, 2002 9:47 am - Hasn't voted
Untitled CommentThank you for the excellent vote!!!
The Wallowas of eastern Oregon are a spectacular place. Though not kknown so much for technical rock climbing, they offer some of the best backpacking and scrambling opportunities in the state (our humble opinion). I believe they have the densest cluster of 9000' peaks in the state.
radek
dsnell - Jan 9, 2003 9:06 pm - Voted 10/10
Untitled CommentGood work! I'll have to check out this mountain on my next trek out west.
rpc - Jan 10, 2003 9:20 am - Hasn't voted
Untitled CommentThank you for the good vote!
rpc - Jan 23, 2003 1:36 pm - Hasn't voted
Untitled CommentThank you for the good vote.
rpc
Klenke - Jan 24, 2003 2:52 pm - Voted 10/10
Untitled CommentRPC, I am curious as to whether it should be Aneroid Peak or Aneroid Mountain, not that it really matters either way. My maps all say Aneroid Mountain. A search on the web brings up Aneroid Mountain the majority of the time, but Aneroid Peak some of the time too. I have always referred to it as Aneroid Mountain. --Paul
rpc - Feb 10, 2003 4:35 pm - Hasn't voted
Untitled CommentPaul,
thanks for the vote. I think it was the OR snowshoe book that referred to it as Aneroid "Peak". Not sure what the USGS maps say. I'll make a note of it on the page.
Radek
Klenke - Nov 9, 2004 11:57 pm - Voted 10/10
Untitled CommentRadek,
The mountain is indeed called Aneroid Mountain, not Aneroid Peak. See the Topozone link (USGS map). You really should change the name (and other textual references to it). The snowshoeing book is wrong.
Also, on the Main Page in the first paragraph you list the other 9,000-ft Wallowa peaks in parentheses. You should note that many new peaks have since been added to SP. You could include those new ones too...unless it looks like clutter.
--Paul
rpc - Nov 10, 2004 2:39 pm - Hasn't voted
Untitled CommentPaul,
I've made the suggested modifications....I agree that the page needed some updating (it was my first SP submission many many years ago ;)
Let me know if you see anything else that might need an update/correction. thnx.
radek
peakbagger4 - Sep 24, 2003 8:54 am - Voted 10/10
Untitled CommentNice!!
rpc - Sep 24, 2003 5:27 pm - Hasn't voted
Untitled Commentthanks Jay!
rpc - Mar 29, 2004 4:20 pm - Hasn't voted
Untitled CommentThank you for the vote.
tlogan - Apr 29, 2004 5:23 pm - Voted 10/10
Untitled CommentGreat page... very thorough and informative as always.
rpc - Apr 29, 2004 5:55 pm - Hasn't voted
Untitled CommentThank you for the good vote.
rpc - Oct 25, 2004 12:30 pm - Hasn't voted
Untitled CommentThanks for the good vote.
rpc - Nov 19, 2004 1:42 pm - Hasn't voted
Untitled CommentThanks for the good vote.